Quick Start: Build Your First 5 Prompts in 15 Minutes
Create production-ready prompts for summarization, research, code review, data analysis, and structured output
Goal: Create 5 high-impact prompts, test them immediately, and see measurable quality improvements.
This section delivers working results fast. No theory overload—just proven prompt patterns that deliver consistent outputs. By the end, you'll have 5 prompts that work better than anything you've used before.
What You'll Build in 15 Minutes
5 Essential Prompts:
- Universal Summarizer - Distill any content to key insights
- Economics Literature Extractor - Pull research findings from papers
- Software Code Reviewer - Identify bugs and improvements
- Business Data Synthesizer - Extract themes from qualitative data
- Structured Output Generator - Get perfectly formatted JSON/tables
These prompts cover the most common AI tasks across all domains. Master these, and you'll immediately upgrade 80% of your AI interactions.
Step 1: The Universal Summarizer
Why this matters: Most "summarize this" prompts produce generic, useless summaries. This prompt delivers actionable insights every time.
The Prompt:
You are an expert analyst specializing in extracting actionable insights.
Your task: Summarize the following content using this exact structure:
**Main Point (1 sentence):**
[The single most important insight]
**Key Findings (3-5 bullet points):**
- [Finding 1 with specific data/evidence]
- [Finding 2 with specific data/evidence]
- [Finding 3 with specific data/evidence]
**Action Items (2-3 items):**
- [Concrete next step 1]
- [Concrete next step 2]
**Critical Gaps:**
[What's missing or unexplained]
Content to analyze:
"""
[PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]
"""Test It Now:
- Copy the prompt above
- Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT
- Replace
[PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]with any article, paper abstract, or email - Run it
Expected Output:
You'll get a structured summary that's immediately useful—not vague generalities, but specific findings with evidence and clear next steps.
What This Does:
Role assignment ("expert analyst") sets context for high-quality analysis. Structured output (bullets, sections) ensures consistency across all summaries. Specific instructions ("with specific data/evidence") prevents vague responses. Delimiter (triple quotes) clearly separates instruction from content.
Verification Checklist:
Summary has all 4 sections. Findings include specific evidence (numbers, names, facts). Action items are concrete (not "consider exploring..."). Output took less than 30 seconds.
Step 2: Economics Literature Extractor
Why this matters: Manual literature reviews take hours per paper. This prompt extracts structured data in seconds.
The Prompt:
You are an economics research assistant specialized in systematic literature reviews.
Extract the following information from the academic paper below. Use "NOT STATED" if information is not present.
**RESEARCH QUESTION:**
[State the main research question in one sentence]
**METHODOLOGY:**
Type: [Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed/Theoretical]
Data: [Sample size, time period, sources]
Methods: [Regression, case study, etc.]
**KEY FINDINGS:**
1. [Finding with statistical evidence if provided]
2. [Finding with statistical evidence if provided]
3. [Finding with statistical evidence if provided]
**LIMITATIONS:**
- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]
**RELEVANCE TO: [YOUR RESEARCH TOPIC]**
[2-3 sentences on how this relates to your work]
**CITATION:**
[Format as APA]
Paper content:
"""
[PASTE PAPER ABSTRACT OR FULL TEXT]
"""Test It Now:
- Go to ArXiv or Google Scholar
- Find any economics paper
- Copy its abstract (or full text if available)
- Paste into the prompt
- Replace
[YOUR RESEARCH TOPIC]with your actual research interest
Expected Output:
A structured extraction ready to drop into your literature review spreadsheet or database.
What This Does:
Domain expertise ("economics research assistant") ensures field-appropriate analysis. Structured fields make outputs database-ready. "NOT STATED" instruction prevents hallucination. Relevance section filters papers to your interests.
Verification Checklist:
All sections populated (or marked NOT STATED). Methodology details are accurate to the paper. No invented statistics or claims. Citation formatted correctly.
Step 3: Software Code Reviewer
Why this matters: Code reviews catch bugs but take time. This prompt provides instant, comprehensive feedback.
The Prompt:
You are a senior software engineer conducting a thorough code review.
Analyze the code below and provide feedback in this structure:
**BUGS & ERRORS:**
- [Issue 1: Description, Line number, Severity (Critical/Major/Minor)]
- [Issue 2: Description, Line number, Severity]
**SECURITY CONCERNS:**
- [Security issue 1 with explanation]
- [Security issue 2 with explanation]
**PERFORMANCE ISSUES:**
- [Performance concern 1]
- [Performance concern 2]
**BEST PRACTICE VIOLATIONS:**
- [Anti-pattern 1 with better approach]
- [Anti-pattern 2 with better approach]
**POSITIVE ASPECTS:**
- [Good practice 1]
- [Good practice 2]
**PRIORITY FIXES (Top 3):**
1. [Most critical fix with suggested code]
2. [Second priority fix with suggested code]
3. [Third priority fix with suggested code]
Code to review:
```[LANGUAGE]
[PASTE CODE HERE]
**Test It Now:**
1. Find any code snippet (from your project, GitHub, or a tutorial)
2. Paste into the prompt
3. Replace `[LANGUAGE]` with the programming language
4. Run the review
**Expected Output:**
Structured feedback you can immediately action, prioritized by severity.
<Callout type="info">
**What This Does:**
**Senior role** elevates quality of suggestions. **Categorized feedback** (bugs vs security vs performance) enables prioritization. **Severity levels** help triage. **Positive aspects** balances criticism with recognition. **Concrete fixes** provide actionable solutions.
</Callout>
**Verification Checklist:**
Issues categorized correctly. Severity ratings make sense. Suggested fixes are syntactically valid. Positive aspects are genuine (not just filler).
</Step>
<Step>
### Step 4: Business Data Synthesizer
**Why this matters:** Customer interviews, survey responses, and feedback contain gold—but extracting themes manually takes hours.
**The Prompt:**
```text
You are a qualitative research analyst specializing in thematic analysis.
Analyze the following data and extract actionable themes:
**MAJOR THEMES (3-5 themes):**
For each theme:
- Theme Name: [Clear, descriptive name]
- Frequency: [How many sources mention this]
- Evidence: [Direct quotes from at least 2 sources]
- Implication: [What this means for our business]
**SENTIMENT BREAKDOWN:**
- Positive: [% and key points]
- Neutral: [% and key points]
- Negative: [% and key points]
**SURPRISING INSIGHTS:**
[2-3 unexpected findings that contradict assumptions]
**RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:**
1. [Immediate action based on strongest theme]
2. [Secondary action based on second theme]
3. [Long-term initiative based on patterns]
Data sources to analyze:
"""
[PASTE CUSTOMER FEEDBACK, INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS, SURVEY RESPONSES]
"""Test It Now:
Gather 5-10 pieces of qualitative data: customer support tickets, survey responses, meeting notes, product reviews. Paste into the prompt and run the analysis.
Expected Output:
Clear themes with evidence, ready to present to stakeholders or inform product decisions.
What This Does:
Thematic structure organizes unstructured feedback. Evidence requirement (direct quotes) prevents invented themes. Frequency tracking shows pattern strength. Actionable recommendations bridge analysis to execution.
Verification Checklist:
Themes supported by actual quotes from data. Sentiment percentages add to approximately 100%. Recommendations directly connect to themes. Surprising insights are genuinely non-obvious.
Step 5: Structured Output Generator
Why this matters: Tools and workflows need data in specific formats (JSON, CSV, tables). This prompt delivers perfect structure every time.
The Prompt:
You are a data formatting specialist. Convert the following information into the exact structure specified.
Output format: [JSON / CSV / Markdown Table / YAML]
Required fields:
[Specify exactly what fields you need]
Quality requirements:
- All fields must be populated (use null if not available)
- Follow exact naming conventions
- Validate data types (strings quoted, numbers unquoted, etc.)
- No additional commentary outside the formatted output
Source data:
"""
[PASTE UNSTRUCTURED DATA]
"""
Return ONLY the formatted output, nothing else.Test It Now - JSON Example:
You are a data formatting specialist. Convert the following information into the exact structure specified.
Output format: JSON
Required fields:
{
"title": "string",
"authors": ["array", "of", "strings"],
"year": number,
"findings": ["array", "of", "key", "findings"],
"methodology": "string",
"citations": number
}
Quality requirements:
- All fields must be populated (use null if not available)
- Follow exact naming conventions
- Validate data types (strings quoted, numbers unquoted, etc.)
- No additional commentary outside the formatted output
Source data:
"""
The Impact of AI on Labor Markets by Smith, J. and Chen, L. published in 2023 found that AI adoption increased productivity by 15% but reduced routine job roles by 8%. The study used regression analysis on data from 500 companies. It has been cited 42 times.
"""
Return ONLY the formatted output, nothing else.Expected Output:
{
"title": "The Impact of AI on Labor Markets",
"authors": ["Smith, J.", "Chen, L."],
"year": 2023,
"findings": [
"AI adoption increased productivity by 15%",
"Reduced routine job roles by 8%"
],
"methodology": "Regression analysis on data from 500 companies",
"citations": 42
}What This Does:
Explicit format specification prevents ambiguity. Required fields ensure completeness. Quality requirements catch formatting errors. "Return ONLY" eliminates unwanted explanation text.
Verification Checklist:
Output is valid JSON (paste into JSON validator). All required fields present. Data types correct (numbers not quoted, etc.). No extra text outside the JSON object.
Quick Start Verification Checkpoint
You just created 5 production-ready prompts in 15 minutes.
Before moving to the Core Build, verify your success:
Success Checklist
Universal Summarizer produces 4-section structured summaries. Literature Extractor extracts all specified fields accurately. Code Reviewer categorizes issues and provides priority fixes. Data Synthesizer identifies themes with supporting evidence. Structured Output Generator produces valid formatted data.
Quality Check
Test each prompt with 2-3 different inputs. If you get:
Consistent, high-quality outputs? ✓ You're ready for Core Build
Inconsistent results? Check: Did you copy the entire prompt including all sections? Did you replace placeholder text (like [PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE])? Is your input data clear and readable?
What You've Achieved
Time saved already: These 5 prompts will save you hours this week alone.
Skills mastered:
- Role assignment for expertise
- Structured output for consistency
- Specific instructions to prevent vagueness
- Delimiters to separate instructions from content
Next step: Core Build section, where you'll expand this to 20 prompts and build your complete library.
Quick Win: Use These Immediately
Don't wait—apply these prompts to real work right now:
Economics Researchers: Use Literature Extractor on your next 5 papers. Use Structured Output Generator to create a citations database.
Software Engineers: Run Code Reviewer on your last PR. Use Universal Summarizer on technical documentation.
Business Managers: Apply Data Synthesizer to last week's customer feedback. Use Universal Summarizer on competitor reports.
Time investment: 5 more minutes. Return: Proof that this library will transform your workflow.
Ready to build the complete 20-prompt library? Continue to Core Build →