Extension Patterns: Advanced Production Techniques
Learn distributed logging, metrics collection, and self-healing patterns for enterprise-grade automation
Extension Patterns: Advanced Production Techniques
Once you've mastered basic error handling and logging, these advanced patterns will help you scale your automation to enterprise-grade reliability.
Three Production Patterns
Centralized Log Aggregation
When running multiple automation scripts across different systems, centralized logging becomes critical for debugging and monitoring.
Concept: Send all logs to a central location where they can be searched, filtered, and correlated across systems.
Use distributed logging when you have multiple automation scripts running on different machines or when you need to correlate events across systems. This pattern is essential when debugging issues that span multiple components or when you need to search through logs from different time periods quickly.
Simple Implementation:
# Send logs to syslog (built into macOS/Linux)
logger -t "my-automation" -p user.error "Failed to process file: $filename"
# Query logs later
log show --predicate 'eventMessage contains "my-automation"' --last 1hKey Tools:
- syslog/journald: Built-in system logging (free)
- Elasticsearch/Loki: Searchable log storage (open source)
- CloudWatch/Datadog: Managed logging services (paid)
Performance and Health Metrics
Beyond logs, tracking metrics gives you quantitative insights into your automation's health and performance.
Concept: Collect numerical data (counts, timings, rates) and visualize trends over time to identify issues before they become failures.
Use metrics collection when you need to track performance trends, identify slowdowns before they cause failures, or understand usage patterns. Metrics answer questions like "How long did the scraping take?" or "What percentage of API calls succeeded?" that logs alone can't easily answer.
Minimal Example:
# Track success/failure counts
echo "automation_success_total 1" | curl -X POST --data-binary @- \
http://localhost:9091/metrics/job/my-automationKey Patterns:
- Counter metrics: Total successes, failures, items processed
- Timing metrics: Execution duration, API response times
- Gauge metrics: Current queue size, active connections
- Rate calculations: Success rate, error rate, throughput
Popular Tools:
- Prometheus + Grafana: Open source monitoring stack
- StatsD: Simple metrics aggregation
- Application Insights: Azure's metrics service
Automatic Recovery Systems
Self-healing automation detects failures and automatically attempts recovery without human intervention.
Concept: Build automation that monitors itself, detects failures, and takes corrective action automatically—from simple restarts to complex recovery procedures.
Use self-healing patterns when you need high availability but can't guarantee immediate human response to failures. This is essential for critical automation running outside business hours or for systems where temporary failures are expected and can be resolved automatically. Start with simple auto-restart patterns before implementing complex recovery logic.
Auto-Restart Pattern:
# Simple watchdog that restarts on failure
while true; do
./my-automation.sh || notify "Automation failed, restarting in 60s"
sleep 60
doneSelf-Healing Strategies:
- Auto-restart: Restart failed process after delay
- Fallback data: Use cached results when live data unavailable
- Circuit breaker: Stop trying after repeated failures
- Auto-scaling: Spawn more workers under heavy load
- Health checks: Periodic self-tests with automatic recovery
Advanced Example (Concept): When your automation detects three consecutive API failures, it automatically switches to a backup API endpoint, sends an alert to the team, and continues processing. After 10 minutes, it tests the primary API again and switches back if healthy.
When to Use These Patterns
These advanced patterns add complexity to your automation. Start with basic error handling and logging from the Core Build section, then add these patterns only when you have clear requirements. Distributed logging makes sense when managing five or more automation scripts. Metrics collection becomes valuable when you need to track performance trends over weeks or months. Self-healing is essential for critical automation that runs unattended, but simpler retry logic may suffice for less critical tasks.
Implementation Roadmap
Start with the pattern that addresses your biggest pain point:
Choose Distributed Logging if: You waste time SSHing into different servers to check logs, or you need to correlate events across multiple systems.
Choose Metrics Collection if: You need to answer questions about trends (getting slower? more failures?), or you want to set up alerts based on thresholds (error rate > 5%).
Choose Self-Healing if: You have critical automation that must run 24/7, or you experience predictable transient failures that resolve with a retry.
Next Steps
These patterns represent production-grade automation used by major technology companies. As your automation scales, you'll naturally encounter scenarios where these patterns become necessary. Start small, measure the impact, and iterate.
Ready to debug like a pro? Head to the Troubleshooting chapter for solutions to common issues.